Ukraine: The Fertile Battleground in the Global Politics of Farmland

⸻

For centuries, land has been at the heart of power - economically, politically, and strategically. But in the 21st century, it’s not just any land that shapes global affairs; it’s farmland. And in this arena, Ukraine stands out as a geopolitical keystone, its vast, fertile fields both a blessing and a curse. As the world grapples with food insecurity, climate change, and shifting power dynamics, Ukraine’s agricultural potential plays a significant, often overlooked role in its ongoing conflict.

The Black Earth: Ukraine’s Agricultural Superpower

Ukraine possesses one of the most agriculturally rich regions on the planet. Over 25% of the world’s most fertile soil - chernozem, or “black earth” - lies within its borders. These soils are rich in humus, nutrients, and moisture, making them ideal for growing grains like wheat, corn, and barley.

Before the 2022 Russian invasion, Ukraine was:

• The 5th largest exporter of wheat in the world

• A major supplier of corn, sunflower oil, and barley

• Known as the “breadbasket of Europe”, feeding nations far beyond its borders

This vast productivity wasn’t just economic; it had geopolitical weight. For countries in the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Asia, Ukrainian grain was a vital source of food. In a world with rising food prices and supply chain vulnerabilities, Ukraine’s soil became a silent force in global stability.

Land as Power: Why Farmland Is Political

Ownership and control over farmland increasingly shape international politics. As climate change threatens arable land in many countries, fertile farmland becomes a strategic asset. In recent decades, sovereign wealth funds, multinational agribusinesses, and even foreign governments have scrambled to invest in or lease farmland in Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

In Ukraine, however, land ownership has long been a contentious issue:

• For decades, a moratorium on the sale of agricultural land blocked private ownership and foreign investment.

• Only in 2021 was the moratorium lifted, opening the door to domestic sales and, eventually, foreign acquisition.

• Critics warned of land grabs by oligarchs or foreign entities exploiting Ukraine’s economic vulnerability.

This policy shift dramatically increased the political value of Ukrainian farmland and intensified concerns about who would control it if the country were destabilized.

War and Wheat: Agriculture in the Crosshairs

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine didn’t just target cities and infrastructure—it disrupted the agricultural economy:

• Grain exports were halted or delayed, triggering food crises in dependent nations like Egypt, Lebanon, and Somalia.

• Russian forces occupied large agricultural zones in the south and east, including parts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Donetsk.

• Fields became battlegrounds, with landmines, destroyed equipment, and fuel shortages crippling farming operations.

Control over farmland became a strategic military goal, not just economic collateral damage. Capturing fertile regions chokes Ukraine economically while potentially absorbing valuable agricultural assets into its own food supply and export economy.

The New Frontier: Farmland and the Future

The disruption of Ukrainian grain exports, especially after the 2022 Russian invasion, forced many countries that once relied heavily on Ukraine’s wheat, corn, and sunflower oil to confront the vulnerabilities in their food systems. Nations in North Africa and the Middle East - such as Egypt, Lebanon, and Tunisia - were hit particularly hard, as Ukraine had been a key supplier of affordable grain. In response, several of these countries began to accelerate domestic agricultural reforms, invest in irrigation infrastructure, diversify import partners, and explore food self-sufficiency strategies. Egypt, for instance, expanded its wheat cultivation efforts in the Western Desert, while others turned to alternative suppliers like India, Romania, or Russia. This also becomes an opportunity for other countries to develop their own land and to capitalize on Ukraine's loss. It will be exciting to watch how the situation develops.

Conclusion: The Politics Beneath Our Feet

Ukraine’s story reminds us that farmland is far more than just dirt and crops—it is power, identity, and leverage. In the political ecology of the 21st century, fertile land is a battleground not only of armies, but of interests, ideologies, and futures.